Inappropriate language

Welcome back to a new term!

Before we delve into details of social variations in English, there’s time to consider a topic which crosses all sorts of social groups. Ideas about what is appropriate and not appropriate language for context are regularly being debated. Last June, Ofcom published a report of its survey into public attitudes to swearing on television. Press responses ranged from ‘public relaxed about swearing’ (The Guardian) to outrage at the misrepresentative research methods (Daily Mail). As we start a new school year, it's worth remembering that the issue of acceptable language inside schools requires definite decisions from head teachers and managers. Some schools opt for ‘zero tolerance’, not just policing language in the classroom but also in the corridors and playground.

The question, of course, raises many linguistic issues. Dominant groups and social norms are important here. Public and private uses of language also matter. And of course, the idea that language is an aspect of identity, whether of an individual or a group. Is swearing in school an expression of personal freedom, or is it a rejection of social conventions and a deliberate choice to offend others? In school contexts, is it a part of ‘not knowing better’ that a good education can remedy?

Use the suggested reading to help you think through what matters and what you think about a ‘zero tolerance’ approach. Then explain your findings and argue your opinions in a clear and interesting way. Make sure you include some academic material (see the David Crystal extract ) as well as researched opinions and your own ideas.